Hugo Awards 2026: The Hottest Takes and Wildest Predictions for Best Novel!

The air crackles with anticipation as the 2026 Hugo Readalong reaches its thrilling climax, focusing intently on the nominees for Best Novel. After weeks of intense discussion, the genre fiction community is now in a frenzy, dissecting every aspect of the shortlist and offering their most fervent opinions.

Everyone has an opinion on the six acclaimed novels: Nnedi Okorafor’s *Death of the Author*, Adrian Tchaikovsky’s *Shroud*, Emily Tesh’s *The Incandescent*, Alix E. Harrow’s *The Everlasting*, Antonia Hodgson’s *The Raven Scholar*, and Robert Jackson Bennett’s *A Drop of Corruption*. The sheer diversity and quality of these works have ignited a fiery discussion, with readers split between two distinct camps.

Read next'I Read the Entire Book Wrong': Sci-Fi Readers Clash Over Hidden Robots and 25-Year Fan Theories

One vocal group is all about looking forward, strategizing and predicting the outcomes. They're already casting their gaze to the 2027 awards, asking which novels published this year might be worthy contenders and capture the imagination of future Hugo voters. This camp finds immense enjoyment in the statistical game of the Hugos. "One of the most fun parts of the Hugo season is the stat drop after the finalists are announced," one person commented, eager to see which stories just missed the coveted six-slot shortlist. They're making bold predictions for the novels that will land in the agonizing 7th or 8th place, just outside the spotlight. Others are trying to game out the entire voting process, asking, "Which novel do you expect to win? Any bold predictions for how the voting shakes out?" For these readers, understanding voter psychology and anticipating the unexpected are as thrilling as the books themselves.

However, a strong counter-current flows from the passionate advocates and critics who are deeply invested in the current shortlist's merit and representation. Their discussions are less about predictions and more about pure preference and perceived injustices. "Which novel do you hope will win the award? How would you rank the list?" is a common refrain, indicating a desire to champion their personal favorites. This group is highly critical of the shortlist as a whole, questioning whether it truly captures the best of 2025's genre novels. They are quick to identify and lament "notable snubs," spotlighting authors or books they feel were egregiously overlooked. "If you're voting, is there anything you plan to leave off your ballot or rank below No Award?" someone else asked, highlighting a willingness to challenge the official selections directly. For this camp, the integrity and comprehensive quality of the list are paramount, and they are not shy about calling out perceived flaws or omissions.

Your brand, right here.Reach story-obsessed listeners in 45+ languages → advertise on Avonetics

The debate rages on, fueled by both strategic foresight and heartfelt advocacy. Is it more satisfying to correctly predict the winners and near-misses, or to passionately champion the books that, in your opinion, truly deserve the accolades? As the final votes are tallied and the Hugo Awards ceremony approaches, the community remains electrified, ready to celebrate, critique, and continue the vibrant conversation around the best in science fiction and fantasy.

The hosts of Plot Twist dig into this very debate on the podcast.