Three Sets, No Mercy: The Controversial New Cricket Format Turning the Game Into Tennis

Cricket is facing a radical identity crisis, and a bold new proposal is threatening to tear up the traditional scorecard in favor of tennis-style sets.

Under this controversial blueprint, matches are played in a Best of 3 Sets format. The team that wins two sets first claims overall victory. Each set consists of five overs per team, totaling ten overs per set. But unlike standard short-form cricket, the room for error is microscopic.

Read nextCREASE CRASHER: Village Cricket Final Explodes into Pure Anarchy After 'Savage' Mankad Wicket!

In Set 1, a team’s batting innings ends after four wickets fall or five overs are completed. In Sets 2 and 3, the pressure intensifies further: an innings is terminated after just three wickets fall.

The rule raising the most eyebrows is the Continuity Rule. Any batter who finishes a set not out must open the batting in the following set. However, any batter who is dismissed is immediately disqualified from batting for the remainder of the match.

Strategic dominance is rewarded early. The winner of the first set gains the tactical advantage to choose whether to bat or bowl first in the second set. Meanwhile, ties within individual sets are permitted, as the overall outcome rests strictly on set victories.

To escalate the drama, bowling restrictions are entirely removed. Captains can unleash their star bowler for all five overs of a set without cap limits.

The concept has sparked intense debate across the cricket community.

One commenter said the format is pure genius, noting that it restores genuine tactical tension and forces captains to manage risk with grandmaster precision.

Your brand, right here.Reach story-obsessed listeners in 45+ languages → advertise on Avonetics

Another argued that unlimited bowling overs paired with tiny wicket limits creates an incredible showcase for fast bowlers, eliminating the dull middle overs seen in modern T20s.

However, traditionalists are pushing back hard.

One critic declared that restricting wickets to three per set converts the sport into an unbearable lottery where a single poor decision ruins the entire match.

Another argued that allowing one bowler to deliver all five overs destroys club culture, leaving fielders standing around while two players dominate the game.

A third critic noted that disqualifying dismissed batters ruins team morale, leaving tailenders with no opportunity for redemption.

On the latest episode of Silly Point, our hosts battle over whether this format is the future of broadcast sports or a recipe for locker room mutiny.