"This Is Piss Poor": Boss Demolishes Student's Draft After Communicating in Dictated Voice Texts

Stepping into your first professional corporate role is supposed to feel like an achievement. For an art and web design student landing an $18-an-hour remote position, it felt like winning the draft. Originally applying to be a personal assistant and walk a manager's dogs, the worker was thrilled when the boss offered a real creative design role instead. But within thirty days, that initial excitement dissolved into utter chaos.

The primary issue stems from executive communication—or the complete lack thereof. The manager routinely sends project instructions via hands-free speech-to-text dictation while driving or multi-tasking. The resulting messages arrive as unpunctuated walls of text, littered with typos, broken syntax, and incomplete thoughts. For weeks, the designer spent hours deciphering these voice-to-text fragments, taking exhaustive notes, and attempting to piece together usable project guidelines.

Read nextOffice Intrigue! Lone Worker Targets for Secret Colleague Conspiracy

Things came to a head after an hour-long phone call regarding a new business opportunity packet. The boss rattled off dozens of complex directives, from multifamily housing statistics to lead generation models. The designer compiled those directives into a thorough 17-page first draft complete with chapters, data charts, and clear placeholders for missing assets. Sending it off with explicit instructions that it was an initial draft awaiting feedback, the designer expected normal creative revisions.

Instead, the boss responded with total hostility, texting that he could get the document done for $5 on a cheap freelancing platform. He followed up by declaring the 17-page document "piss poor" and threatening termination if he ever saw work like that again, completely forgetting he had explicitly requested the project during their phone call.

Public reaction to the situation quickly divided into opposing camps on how junior employees should respond. One commenter argued that workers should establish immediate boundaries, advising the designer to tell the manager: "Do not speak to me like that. If this didn't meet your expectations, give me clear guidance." Others suggested introducing strict administrative protocols, such as requiring formal creative briefs and sending immediate post-call email summaries to create an undisputed paper trail.

Your brand, right here.Reach story-obsessed listeners in 45+ languages → advertise on Avonetics

However, another vocal segment argued that trying to train an abusive manager is a fool's errand. A second commenter insisted that the designer should simply look for new work while doing the absolute minimum, pointing out that an executive who compares custom labor to a $5 automated template is fundamentally unmanageable.

That sentiment of stepping back and watching toxic management choke on its own dysfunction was mirrored in a parallel industry story from a hotel restaurant. After months of management underpaying staff, violating basic safety standards, and overworking the crew, three of the kitchen's five cooks quit on the exact same day. The remaining two cooks—both starting college and reducing their schedules to 10 hours a week—refused management's desperate pleas to work full-time, leaving the hotel with zero applicants heading into peak catering season.

Our hosts on Clock Out break down both of these incredible workplace sagas in this week's episode.